this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
21 points (100.0% liked)

Hearts of Iron 4, Vic 2, Imperator Rome, EU4, ETC

463 readers
1 users here now

For discussion about paradox games and other related things.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I was referring to the DLC policy of CK3 being used again for EU5, I hope EU5 includes all of EU4’s features at launch

No chance, EU is THE milk cow and the udders will suffer. Also the comparison is somewhat unfair because CK3 at least tried to make it in another way, but sadly i feel like some people deciding this changed midway and suddenly we are back to CK2 politics (but note that on the usuals suspects, vikings and byzantium), some of the DLC's were really good, T&T was probably one of the best DLC for any PDX game ever. Even Royal Court while flawed was a sign things are going in other direction.

Saying EU4 is the worst for DLC is turning a blind eye to the fact that every Paradox game so far after Vic 2 has had horrendous DLC bloat

Yes, but it don't change the fact EU4 is the worst.

[–] commiewolf@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but it don’t change the fact EU4 is the worst.

Subjective, I still think CK2's had it worst, you can't even play as most of the world if you play without DLC. Hoi4 probably makes a good contender due to the absurd pricing.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I still think CK2’s had it worst, you can’t even play as most of the world if you play without DLC

Ah in that cathegory we should go back to EU1, only EU2 was the first game with entire map playable.

Hoi4 probably makes a good contender due to the absurd pricing.

Well i never think about HoI because it's imo consistently least interesting of PDX main games, i can't be even bothered to play it enough to rate it.