[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 8 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

"Donald, at DPRK, his arm salutes. Kim, his face bewildered"

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 12 minutes ago

and ultimately did not change the status quo even slightly.

It did actually, or was on the course to. After this visit Kim announced they are toning down the military expenses to focus on civil development. But when Biden became president and OcK elected even more fascist govt than usual the provocations increased greatly and as an effect DPRK had to get way closer to Russia that anytime before, they even officially entered military defensive pact now.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 17 minutes ago

After Soleimani was killed and a war was nearly started with Iran in January 2020, there was still an “oh shit” moment from the Trump government and they quickly walked back and prevented a war from being escalated.

You got the order wrong, they first backed off from war around september 2019, and then assassinated Soleimani as a last word and consolation prize for hawks (Bolton didn't liked it and got sacked). The actual reason they backed off was that Iran demonstrated both will and ability to defend itself by series of force shows and shooting down the best US drone with old Soviet missile - which also shown pentagon bonzos that the war might be way harder than they though.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 20 minutes ago

Exactly, especially that the drones were proven to be vulnerable to anyone who have an actual military and is willing to oppose USA for real, like Russia, Iran or even Yemen (and unlike Pakistan or Iraq).

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 23 minutes ago

They were before just 5 seconds for starting it for real, then they backed off and killed Soleimani as consolation prize for all the hawks. They were sure Iran wouldn't actively plunge into war over one general after narrowly avoiding at least full scale aerial terror if not outright invasion.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

We already are pokemon. We live in a small balls of poverty with no way out, and each day we are being called by our owners to struggle for their gains.

Minmaxing numbers being taken for an rpg is one of the oldest problems not even with the genre but with fucking game journos and ads. I mean, unless you want to roleplay as accountant.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I remember encountering this first time in Darksiders, it was advertised as an RPG game, and it has accessible difficulty so i finished it and was like "wait is that it"?

From that point of view "soulslike" emerging as tag and genre is positive development.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Agree, and that's the reason they don't have an easy difficulty mode, often called "story mode" in many games - they barely have any story at all. I mean it's ok but at least stop calling them RPG for fucks sake.

DEI gratia regina Americae

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

When starvation came, old people were commiting suicide and claiming they are "going to hunt", "going to wood to forage", "going on the road". Then women. Then children were killed/discarded in woods/dropped at church. I bet some of my ancestors also died like that since i'm coming from poor peasantry. (not only in Poland ofc, basically every country have such stories)

Dark card of history, useful to remind in case of burning hatred for landowners falling below acceptable level. Also worth to remember when some primitivist scum advocate for return to subsistence farming.

23

This can probably give them significant advantage in electronical warfare against such missiles in the future.
Welp another wunderwaffe busted.

50
87
Communist chess set (lemmygrad.ml)

Reds vs Whites, produced circa 1930 in Lomonosov Porcelain Factory in Leningrad

17
27
6

Not tankie, but pretty cheerful song about shortening aristocrats so it fits.

37
12
23
Rare google W (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml to c/shitposting@lemmygrad.ml

I searched for "israel" and first three tooltips were like this (yes even Israel Keyes still counts as win or not as much loss at least compared to Isnt'real since much less bodycount).

26

I just read an interesting letter from Marx to Engels, particularly this fragment was notable

Climate and the Vegetable World throughout the Ages, a History of Both, by Fraas (1847) is very interesting, especially as proving that climate and flora have changed in historic times. He is a Darwinist before Darwin and makes even the species arise in historic times. But he is also an agricultural expert. He maintains that as a result of cultivation and in proportion to its degree, the "damp" so much beloved by the peasant is lost (hence too plants emigrate from south to north) and eventually the formation of steppes begins. The first effects of cultivation are useful, later devastating owing to deforestation, etc. This man is both a thoroughly learned philologist (he has written books in Greek) and a chemist, agricultural expert, etc. The whole conclusion is that cultivation when it progresses in a primitive way and is not consciously controlled (as a bourgeois of course he does not arrive at this), leaves deserts behind it, Persia, Mesopotamia, etc., Greece. Here again another unconscious socialist tendency!

It's about fertility of fields, but then again the entire ecology pretty much started there, and as we can see, when entire thing was not even born yet, in 1868, it is abolutely obvious to Marx that only socialism can have any successes in maintaining the environment.
I thought i would share this since it's interesting how it is now being clearly proven, and maybe it would be of use against the ecofash.

12
A living meme (en.wikipedia.org)

TIL this guy actually exist, some people refer to him as "Napoleon VII" as if every next one after first wasn't an utter disgrace, and best thing is, he lines his questionable royalty from none other than Napoleon-Jerome "Plon-Plon" Bonaparte, the only man Marx mocked more than Napoleon III.

50

I just clicked there and it looks like shittier twitter

view more: next ›

PolandIsAStateOfMind

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF