92
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml to c/us_news@lemmygrad.ml

Try to keep all US election-posting here.

Breakthrough news election night stream, 8pm ET

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Magicicad@lemmygrad.ml 36 points 2 months ago

If the election of a single person can spell the end of your “democracy,” how democratic really was it in the first place?

[-] Addfwyn@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 2 months ago

Considering one of the major candidates didn't even go through anything resembling a primary process, I am going with "not very".

Am I right, do I win?

[-] RedColossus@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 2 months ago

The funny thing is they could’ve ran a lightning election, but the Democratic Party is terrified about, “what if voters don’t choose the anointed candidate?!”

[-] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 months ago

What are you saying you can run an election in less than 4 months?

[-] RedColossus@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Yeah, before Harris there was discussion of doing a lightning primary with just mail-in votes or at least settling at the convection instead of just anointing Kamala.

[-] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 2 months ago

Similar train of thought, the other day I was posing a question to someone who can be pretty lib, like, if the republicans are such a terrible fascist threat, why aren't the powers in charge doing more to suppress them? Instead of just letting them do what they want electorally and being like "we'll vote them out." I think I actually got through to them a bit on that specific point. Like existential threat to "democracy", supposedly, but we're gonna let em do a popularity contest and get power that "takes away democracy", what sense does that make.

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
92 points (94.2% liked)

US News

2073 readers
82 users here now

News from within the empire - From a leftist perspective

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS