207
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BabyTurtles@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

I'm ignoring them because aren't good faith? I didn't say "Jack Smith is literally in this situation", I'm just pointing out how easy it is for armchair revolutionaries to snear from the sidelines when it's not their necks on the line.

[-] REgon@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That you dislike an answer does not make it bad faith

[-] BabyTurtles@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

I found yours, yours is just like gibberish.

You are here presenting the situation as if it was a sudden development, rather than a known risk from the start. You are also presenting it as a definite certainty. Neither of these presentations are correct.

No, risk is a spectrum, like everything. The level of risk changes based on the situation. Jack found it to be an acceptable level of risk, the situation changed, the risk got higher, and it was no longer acceptable to him.

I was presenting a hypothetical situation where risk was the absolute maximum because I want people to use their heads and think about it, and maybe break out of the snearing circlejerk bubble for a second.

[-] REgon@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

Talk about bad faith lol

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
207 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13609 readers
722 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS