157

What types of services are you not willing to self-host? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by Tinnitus@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

126 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For example, something that is too complex for your comfort level, a security concern, or maybe your hardware can’t keep up with the service’s needs?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 13 points 1 year ago

Eh, the clients all cache your vault. It shouldn't be a huge issue for it to be down even for a few days.

But I do upload encrypted backups of the server every 6 hours to cloud storage

[-] Engywuck@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Same.

Plus, my instance is proxies through Clouflare and only IPs from my country are allowed.

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023

157 points (97.0% liked)

Selfhosted

39212 readers

573 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz