Mechanical Engineering

234 readers

2 users here now

Welcome to the Mechanical Engineering Community!

Rules:

1.) Be constructive and respectful.

2.) No advertising/self-promotion.

3.) No low-effort posts.

4.) No "design this for me" posts.

5.) Images must be relevant to Mechanical Engineering or the posted topic.

6.) We're not doing your homework for you.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Alteon@lemmy.world

Phase out of Hexavalent Chromium (MIL-PRF-8625 Type I) - How is your company reacting? (lemmy.world)

submitted 6 months ago by Alteon@lemmy.world to c/mechanical_engineering@lemmy.world

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Wanted to ask about this. I do not work in California, however many of our vendors and customers are seeking to swap to MIL-PRF-8625 Type II, when they historically used Type I.

I'm totally on board with this - anything I can do to push safer, less environmentally destructive processes is a win in my book. But I understand that not all companies are interested in jumping ship so fast.

So I wanted to ask, what's your companies take on it? Did you know about the industry phase out?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I didn't, but we've opted for chem film lately. Old timers seemed more fond of hex chrome for high voltage applications with outdoor exposure, but I don't see why it's better than chem film.