211
submitted 2 weeks ago by Garibaldee@lemm.ee to c/usa@midwest.social
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The original intent of "subject to the jurisdiction of" means areas of the US not under foreign military occupation, or diplomats, and anyone working with diplomats in a diplomatic mission. And probably includes the inside of the embassy/consolate. And maybe the UN building. But it was not supposed to mean anything to do with nationality. And I think "being here illegally" is also very problematic. Like are the enslaved people here "legally"? The 14th amendment was used to give citizenship to enslaved people. Enslaved people aren't considered people in terms of citizenship, and the moment slavery was outlawed, do enslaved people become "illegal immigrants". So are we just gonna remove citizenship from every decendent of an enslaved person in the us?

How do we even know who is here legally and who's not. And what if we found an "illegal" immigrant that entered in the 1900s, are we gonna deport every of their decendents?

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
211 points (99.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2036 readers
534 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS