It's true, there are significant difference. One is a response to ethnic cleansing and NATO expansion,while the other is a genocidal regime invading its neighbour.
and what might that rest be? because I'm not interested in hearing some whining about ukraine buying weapons from the west or some shit, nato didn't expand into ukraine or something and even if they did it wouldn't be russias decision to make
and what might that rest be? because I'm not interested in hearing some whining about ukraine buying weapons from the west or some shit, nato didn't expand into ukraine or something and even if they did it wouldn't be russias decision to make
Well yeah, it's different. The two situations are not remotely comparable.
It's true, there are significant difference. One is a response to ethnic cleansing and NATO expansion,while the other is a genocidal regime invading its neighbour.
didn't russia promise ukraines independence?
They still do, if the rest of the original treaty is upheld.
and what might that rest be? because I'm not interested in hearing some whining about ukraine buying weapons from the west or some shit, nato didn't expand into ukraine or something and even if they did it wouldn't be russias decision to make
and what might that rest be? because I'm not interested in hearing some whining about ukraine buying weapons from the west or some shit, nato didn't expand into ukraine or something and even if they did it wouldn't be russias decision to make