this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
13 points (66.7% liked)
People's Court
493 readers
1 users here now
This is a community for Lemmygrad users and admins to discuss administrative issues in a more transparent manner
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Thanks for the summary. I think in cases like this, as uncomfortable as it can be, it's important to have the full text so I wouldn't worry about posting relevant links in this comm. I've seen the link now. I'll have a think.
My first thoughts are: what do you and they mean by Rojava? If they mean to limit it to a particular set of relations that amount to a US proxy, that's one thing (and quite a claim but possibly not a call for genocide). If they're using Rojava more like you, as the Kurds in that part of the world, it's quite another. Both readings seem possible, which is problematic.
If you need more context, this other interaction could help to understand more that discussion: -> https://lemmygrad.ml/post/6440034/5647622
Thanks.
The person I was talking about calls the people of Rojava "terrorists" and then says they're gleeful about "what's coming to them". The only country that calls SDF/YPG/Rojava/Kurds terrorists is Turkey.
...
We have a person literally advocating for Turkey (a founding member NATO state) to ethnically cleanse Kurds from Rojava (because they are terrorists), but that's alright, cause SDF took money from the US.
Rojava is not "tearing [Syria] piece by peace", they are actually defending Syria's integrity against Turkish invasion. Yet this person doesn't see it that way, why is that so? Perhaps he thinks Turkey has the right to go in and ethnically cleanse Kurds.