this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
157 points (95.9% liked)
El Chisme
397 readers
13 users here now
Place for posting about the dumb shit public figures say.
Rules:
Rule 1: The subject of a post must be a public person.
Rule 2: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 3: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 4: No sectarianism.
Rule 5: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 6: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 7: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 8: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Okay, I was partly going for a cheap dunk here. A lot of the issues I have with NYC DSA (I am a former member) are DSA problems generally not NYC specific, and there are plenty of comrades in the org.
HOWEVER, the refusal by NYC DSA to hold electeds to any standards has been absolutely disgraceful, particularly in AoC's case wrt to Palestine
I'm interested in your opinion on the link I just posted below, where it looks to me like it was the NYC chapter that specifically requested the revocation of her endorsement?
I'm not trying to "gotcha" I'm just well outside of the party politics and curious whether that changes your view or not
"NPC received a request from NYC-DSA SC to withdraw the endorsement because it took place after the New York Democratic Primary and they did not expect a conditional endorsement or feel it was strategic."
NYC DSA withdrew their request for endorsement because national put conditions on it regarding Palestine
Your reading comprehension is better than mine, thank u comrade :rat-salute: apologies for my poor interpretation, the coffee machine at Langley is broken today.
Yeah I agree with you that's a shit look. It reads like "we don't need to make this endorsement to win, and we don't feel the need to campaign against our incumbent who is going to win anyway". But in the process wind up looking ambivalent to genocide.
I feel like I can even see the logic where they're like, "how she voted in this meaningless motion that was gonna overwhelmingly pass anyway has no real world impact," but it's like, if you're not even gonna protest the sham votes, why are you there???????????????
No worries comrade, not having to deal with or understand DSA politics is one of the privileges of not being in DSA
Hahahaha preach!