145
submitted 3 weeks ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

Thames Water intentionally diverted millions of pounds pledged for environmental clean-ups towards other costs including bonuses and dividends, the Guardian can reveal.

The company, which serves more than 16 million customers, cut the funds after senior managers assessed the potential risks of such a move.

Discussions – held in secret – considered the risk of a public and regulatory backlash if it emerged that cash set aside for work such as cutting river pollution had been spent elsewhere.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Discussions – held in secret – considered the risk of a public and regulatory backlash

I can only assume said discussions came to the conclusion.

They don't give a shit about the public, and nor do the regulators.

The lack of "regulatory backlash " makes me wonder how well spread these bonuses were.

this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
145 points (100.0% liked)

UK Nature and Environment

418 readers
150 users here now

General Instance Rules:

Community Specific Rules:

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our winter banner is a shot of Shotley marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS