148
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
148 points (100.0% liked)
Linux Gaming
15767 readers
85 users here now
Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.
This page can be subscribed to via RSS.
Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.
Resources
WWW:
Discord:
IRC:
Matrix:
Telegram:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Well this will hopefully be a nice little performance boost for the Steam deck down the line
The article suggests alternative fixes were implemented in Proton - esync and fsync. On searching, Esync is available already in proton everywhere and fsync is a newer better fix but depends on the users kernel build. Steam Proton uses both apparently, with fsync used if your kernel supports it.
So the performance increase may not be as marked or even present on the Steam Deck. The NTSYNC patch will make this universally available including in wine, while Proton already has fixes in place.
It would be interesting to see how NTSYNC compares to fsync. Again on searching, NTSYNC does seem to offer a performance uplift over Fsync, but it doesn't seem to be a dramatic improvement.
There are perf improvements even over fsync (just less significant). Should help with stability in some problematic games too.
Just a minor correction. esync and fsync were in wine 5 years before proton even existed. So they were not implemented into proton, but were already part of it from the start.
The benefit over fsync is that it'll be more correct. Fsync works for the majority of games, but there are programs that will be fixed by using ntsync instead
Why would they call it fsync ffs