this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
41 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1070 readers
51 users here now

A tech news sub for communists

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExtremeDullard 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

She's quite the entrepreneurial type: she's already a successful gold digger and now she's become a crypto sis.

[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think you are going about this wrong. It's unlikely this is a venture she has embarked on on her own initiative. Probably the Trump family as a whole has some kind of a fad tech grifting task force and they suggest this kind of stuff.

Might be just me but I find gold digger as a pejorative sexist. Can't explain why though. Digging for gold by marrying and divorcing wealthy men in itself does not seem abhorrent to me.

[–] ExtremeDullard 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bullshit.

She agrees to put her name on it, she owns it. She's not a victim of the Trump family, she's an accomplice.

[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Agreed. My point was about the process. I am saying she signed off on a lucrative grift. But it makes her a grifter rather than a crypto sis. I would call her a crypto sis if she endorsed the technology. But I am sure she is clueless about it.

[–] ExtremeDullard 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

But it makes her a grifter rather than a crypto sis

Crypto bros are first and foremost scammers who happen to specialize in that particular kind of scam. Whether they understand the underlying technology or not doesn't matter, the same way someone who pays a killer to shoot someone is a murderer even if they know nothing about firearms.

She may be clueless about blockchains but she ain't clueless about padding her bank account with suckers' money.

[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You are right about the fact that almost all crypto peddlers don't understand the underlying technology. But what makes them crypto bros is that they peddle the technology regardless of their lack of comprehension. Melania does not do that which is why I made that differentiation.

This has veered into the territory of not very important stuff though haha

[–] ExtremeDullard 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The thing is, it's not like selling sketchy things is out of character for Melania. So she doesn't lend herself to the benefit of the doubt here.

[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah that's why I called her a grifter repeatedly

[–] KrasnaiaZvezda@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But I am sure she is clueless about it.

That sounds sexist as well...

[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Assuming that a middle aged person with no known tech background does not know what a blockchain is is sexist? Please explain why.

[–] KrasnaiaZvezda@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Partly is because the way you said it seemed like you wouldn't have used the same words if it was a middle aged man, part is because it seemed to imply that she couldn't understand this even if she tried to, while again making no mention of the men not being able to understand it, and if anything, assuming they do understand it, at least better than her.

[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How would one express a similar sentiment in a non sexist way?

[–] KrasnaiaZvezda@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Agreed. My point was about the process. I am saying she signed off on a lucrative grift. But it makes her a grifter rather than a crypto sis. I would call her a crypto sis if she endorsed the technology. But rich people only care about money and not the technology.

Saying something like that instead, pehaps