this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
78 points (91.5% liked)

Technology

35515 readers
343 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's open source and researchers are already duplicating the process, so I'm not sure if that will ever happen.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 15 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

They're gonna ban access to the official service provided by a Chinese company. That's what this is about. The biggest fear is that everybody starts using DeepSeek, and then it will muscle out US companies that fell behind. Once people start using their service, they'll have little reason to switch to something else going forward. Banning it is a protectionist measure that allows US companies to catch up.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This service can be straight-up forked like a Fediverse instance. Banning the service will not hurt competition.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The key for them is that they want the service to be provided by a US company. There are actually already a few companies hosting DeepSeek in US, and I'm sure the techniques will be incorporated by everyone in short order.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

And DeepSeek can continue to release open source models. Banning just the service happens to lower the cahnces of DeepSeek going the same way OpenAI did, as in it would be more unlikely for them to close off the models like OpenAI did if they want to continue shaking up the market.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 20 hours ago

As I explained above the open source models aren't the problem from the US perspective. DeepSeek will obviously continue to release models, and it will likely become the standard outside the west. However, US will not allow it become the dominant service provider in the US, and that's why I expect the service to be banned. The US will force American companies to use a domestic provider, and Europe is likely to do the same.