Meshtastic

502 readers

14 users here now

A community to discuss Meshtastic (https://meshtastic.org/docs/introduction)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Sal@mander.xyz

ponderings (lemmy.zip)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip to c/meshtastic@mander.xyz

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So I just saw a video where somebody made a bulletin board system over the mesh like it's fucking 1999 or something and it got me thinking Would it be possible to send web pages over the mesh as long as they were small?

I went to the DuckDuckGo homepage and copied its HTML source code into a text editor and found out it was something like 46,000 characters and with a 288 character limit it would take 145 messages to send that across. Each message would be something like 0.69% of that page.

It doesn't seem impossible, but you would have to make your pages very lightweight like they were in the 1990s in order to do it efficiently.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder if some optimizations could be made. For example, I saw a video about something called mesh core that somebody was working on that holds routes in memory so that instead of flooding the mesh, it would directly send the data to the node that it's meant for, which might increase the speed.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its certainly interesting! The local community is going to give it a shot at some point. Its way to alpha right now for me but its ultimately what I want. Meshtastic is awesome, but having more garentee on people reviving your messages would be ideal.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

My node is the size of a credit card and the router is 4 miles from my house. It works well enough, mostly, but I am at the edge of what I would consider to be acceptable.

Edit: At least for an antenna, this small. If I were to have a node with a larger antenna, I know for a fact that it would work better.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nice glad to hear. I just want something more reliable than throwing messages into the void and hoping someone gets it.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Fair enough, you do get acknowledgements if it's heard by at least somebody. And throwing messages into the void is kind of the fun part about it.

Because of band openings, for example, the local router has seen nodes several hundred miles away, and therefore I have seen nodes several hundred miles away.