this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
583 points (83.3% liked)

Flippanarchy

545 readers
490 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

ID: WookieeMark @EvilGenXer posted:

"OK so look, Capitalism is right wing.

Period.

If you are pro-capitalism, you are Right Wing.

There is no pro-capitalist Left. That's a polite fiction in the US that no one can afford any longer as the ecosystem is actually collapsing around us."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 16 points 3 days ago (4 children)

What is Finland though? Social democracy seems pretty good but still fits in with capitalism as far as I can tell

[–] ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Neoliberal, just like the rest of the "socialist" nordics (E: having socialised aspects to the state and or economy, or even being a "social democracy" does not socialism make), which are all on the exact same trajectory as the rest of us, only a few years behind.

[–] lurklurk@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Do you have an example of a properly socialist country that is doing better than the nordics?

Otherwise, perhaps we should look closely at the politics in the nordics for inspiration of what to do that actually seems to work?

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago

Finland still pollutes the world at unsustainable levels, exploits the global south for raw materials and cheap labour, and is on a downwards trend to fascism like all of Europe. Liberal democracy only has one conclusion, and it's fascism.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Whatever social safety nets and programs they have will be dismantled as Western capitalism devours itself. As is happening all around Europe

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can you point to any sources or are you just making it up?

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We already see a lot of talk of Cutting back on social spending in favor of military spending.. There's also the pension and retirement changes most of Europe has already implemented to some degree. It's likely we'll see changes as drastic as what the UK are doing right now in the coming years, specially if the war in Ukraine doesn't go the way of NATO.

The changes in pension spending all over Europe are caused by demographic changes, not capitalism. There are more and more retirees becoming older and older, while the working population stays the same or shrinks. A socialist state would have the exact same problems to pay for that.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

So there is nothing saying that it will happen and that all welfare will be gone.

Will we be worse off for a while? Yeah, Europe isn't in a great situation now with the fairly recent COVID outbreak, economic problems, the attempted invasion and ongoing war in Ukraine, energy problems, and climate change. While the future isn't all rainbows and unicorns, it isn't as bleak as you made it in your earlier comment. There isn't anything pointing to the total collapse of welfare and/or the entire economy.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So I make the fairly mild claim that capitalists will destroy the public sector when profits go down. You ask for sources of that claim (even though I'm just making a prediction based on past trends). I then show you that these talks of cutting back spending are already happening, and you dismiss it because I can't predict the future? And I am the biased one here?

[–] lud@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago

If you were just guessing you should just have said so in the first place.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Since people don't work for free and some people have more money than others, finland is obviously an extreme right wing faschist oligarchy where people live in miserable slavery and needs the proletariat red army invasion like right now. Wouldn't even be hard for a landlocked nation. The capital Reykvetsvhik would fall in minutes thanks to the liberated people welcoming their saviors.

Yes im American, how could you tell? /S

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Well, now that Simo is dead anyway, they couldn't take Finland last time! They uh...also didn't fight the nazis until '44-'45, there was also '41-'44...