this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
-14 points (20.8% liked)
FediLore + Fedidrama
2508 readers
24 users here now
Rules
- Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
- When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)
Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.
Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc
(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama
Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse
Partners:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Mate... Go outside
That's a lot to unpack
It's not even true. That's one of the targeters in question and they repeat that everywhere. Look at their registration date.
Registration date doesn't really matter if that person wasn't on Lemmy and wanted to comment after seeing this post.
Anyway, seems like there is a lot of drama spanning across DeviantArt, Reddit, documents on YouTube and Dailymotion videos.
I don't know what to do with this. You do a good job modding !casualconversation@lemm.ee , that's what I'm mostly interested in.
Thanks. People sadly don't use critical investigation which would show such documentation as false (or, more accurately, a mix of falsehoods, exaggerations, and issues already long dealt with, with actual faults of mine currently falling under the last one because time passes). Rule enforcers typically know this (with one exception), it's always onlookers who don't.
If I may, having videos instead of text format isn't really the best way to convey your message
Definitely a rabbit hole. No time enough for now.
I have zero opinion on any of this. I just looked at the modlog and wanted to point out that most of the bans are from .ml
It's basically a right of passage to get banned from .ml so I wouldn't take those as proof of character one way or the other.
If you want to know why I locked the discussion you mentioned, read the community rules. You say I falsely paint myself as a victim as if your whole existence here, which is a day old, doesn't 100% consist of attacks towards me. All the things you claim I am denying guilt of here that actually happened did so years ago, all of which have been compensated for in some way. Had you accused me of some of them at the time, you would have seen me oblige to what you say I haven't done, but here you all are threateningly following me everywhere trying to hold every single thing I've ever said or done against me because of your little grudge, all while making claims that I have been removed from places I haven't actually been removed from.
Is that why you and your co-targeters have been banned from so many places hundreds of times, including some of the places that, if coming from you (even falsely), would be used to paint me as guilty? Is that why it's normal for you to go after people who actually take the time to analyze what's going on?
If I was banned already, then tell me, what were my previous names? Go on.
You wanna say that to the whole community? I'm using it how it was designed to be used, following up on a previous message (and preceding another one) that also used it how it was designed to be used. And these were, in turn, responses to other things where people might say what you just said but haven't. The way to address an issue is not to leave/relocate like someone who was forcefully evicted.