this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
377 points (97.2% liked)

Greentext

4975 readers
1006 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 23 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (5 children)

isn't it kinda dumb to have coding exams that aren't open book? if you don't understand the material, on a well-designed test you'll run out of time even with access to the entire internet

when in the hell would you ever be coding IRL without access to language documentation and the internet? isn't the point of a class to prepare you for actual coding you'll be doing in the future?

disclaimer did not major in CS. but did have a lot of open book tests—failed when I should have failed because I didn't study enough, and passed when I should have passed because the familiarity with the material is what allows you to find your references fast enough to complete the test

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 3 points 27 minutes ago

Most of my CS exams in more advanced classes were take home. Well before the internet though. They were some of the best finals I ever took.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 2 points 13 minutes ago

Yes It is laziness on the teacher's part

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

Assignments involved actual coding but exams were generally pen and paper when I got my degree. If a question involved coding, they were just looking for a general understanding and didn't nitpick syntax. The "language" used was more of a c++-like pseudocode than any real specific language.

ChatGPT could probably do well on such exams because making up functions is fair game, as long as it doesn't trivialize the question and demonstrates an overall understanding.

[–] MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

I mean, I don't know how to code but I imagine it's the same as with other subjects. like not being able to use a calculator during some math tests. The point of the examination is for you to demonstrate you know and understand the concepts. It's not for you to be tested in the same way you would be in the real world.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I know people that used to work in programming with zero internet connection... this was ~10 years ago... never underestimate the idiocy of companies. P.s. it wasnt even a high security job, the owners were just paranoid boomers.

With that said, with a decent IDE with autocomplete, you can get by a lot without documentation. Its ussually the niche stuff that you need to look up on how to do it.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

You'd have a wall full of documentation before internet was a common source of data.