this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
32 points (97.1% liked)

sdfpubnix

1350 readers
6 users here now

Fans of SDF

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
SDF
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't entirely agree with this.

banned when you go to what's meant to be a safe space

He said he wasn't in a thread on Blahaj. He was just on Lemmy.

misgender people despite being asked to stop

But if he considers dude gender neutral (which is a fairly common view), then he didn't misgender anyone. Straight from Wikipedia:

In the early 1960s, dude became prominent in surfer culture as a synonym of guy or fella. The female equivalent was "dudette" or "dudess", but these have both fallen into disuse and "dude" is now also used as a unisex term. This more general meaning of "dude" started creeping into the mainstream in the mid-1970s.

So it seems he was falsely accused of misgendering someone, and when he clarified how he uses slang, said use wasn't respected.

Ofc I haven't seen his actual comment and it's entirely possible he was a total dick about it, but based on his explanation I feel it's a bit of an overreaction to moderate him.

[โ€“] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I interpreted differently. I assumed the thread was on blahaj but was not a meta thread about blahaj. However, you're probably right.

If they were on another instance and just had a disagreement with a blahaj user about the term, then I'd say that's over moderation to block them unless they were being abusive, or a dick about it.

I could also see how a mod could block him as a user and accidentally block him from the instance if it was a year ago as mod tools weren't great. Although I don't use them.

However, as you say, depending on what the comments were, it could be the blahaj user was the one being the dick here.