hitmyspot

IED is being mean?

No, it's Great Britain AND Northern Ireland. Both being part of the UK. If you're going to be pedantic, be correct.

Free movement between Ireland and the UK predates the EU and continues to this day. One part of the Brexit discussions was continuing border free travel between north and south on the island of Ireland.

I agree, nobody is coming to save you and you have to do it for yourselves. Bombing protestors, however distasteful, will make it so there is nothing worth saving.

Don't get me wrong. Terrorism can work. And today's terrorist is tomorrow's freedom fighter. I don't thinknthe USA is at that level of oppression for mqny people to be sympathetic to a terrorist movement, which is a requirement for it to work.

Northern Ireland? Nobody. And tensions remain today but people can love normal loves without oppression.

Or you mean Palestine? Terrorist attacks on either side didn't help either. Eventually it lead to genocide.

You're conflating state sponsored violence with random Nazi supporters joking them as private malitia.

Absolutely violence should not be avoided where violence is already being used. However, by all account these nazis were protestors, not the agents of the government.

Nazis are still people and there is still a spectrum of violence and beliefs. In the Nazi bar analogy, they all end up being nazis by virtue of association and tolerance of Nazi views. You're making the leap to all being Nazis immediately.

Non violent far right protestors have the right to protest and their beliefs. Where they have already perpetrated violence, they should receive it in kind or, ideally prosecution.

The use of IED is not that and just normalises it's use. Which side has the bigger propensity for violence and bombing of unarmed civilians?

The Dems and the left have a problem where they tut tut and pearl clutch rather than taking action. Jumping to bombing protests is not the answer, however distasteful those protests are.

And Guam, and even US embassies based in Europe are technically part of the USA too, but that's not what's being referred to.

Most people would be surprised if he was transparently honest at any point in his professional career. It's all spin and lies.

Terrorism with IEDs is a threat to safety of all and to democracy, even if it is directed at nazis.

Also, what do you think the Nazis do next?

I presume they expect to either way. What this would be designed to do is build resentment in those countries for the bombings against the USA and the governments that align with the USA.

Also, having someone that will continue to make things worse is why its as bad as it can be. The future is known.

Glad the Ellison wasted their money on blocking Netflix from monopoly then.