5
Mutant Reviewers article: Six of the worst cult sequels out of the β90s
(mutantreviewersmovies.com)
Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org
Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.
A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome
Related communities:
Show communities:
Discussion communities:
RULES
Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.
Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the titleβs subject matter.
Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.
2024 discussion threads
Nice listicle, but would have been better to write something inciteful as to why all these sequels failed so hard.
It wasn't just the cash grab, but a fundamental misunderstanding of what made the previous film great.
Kids loved watching the original RoboCop because it was R rated. It was a comic book film with gore and guns. It was illicit.
Then they turned him into a cartoon character for kids.
Police academy became a paradox of itself. You could argue that the public perception of the police had changed significantly between the original and Mission to Moscow too. It was no longer funny to be entertained by the thought of inept police.
Anyway, that's just off the top of my head.
I'm gonna be that guy:
insightful is the right word here. As in "full of insight".
Incite is pronounced the same but it refers to instigating or provoking, e.g. "incite a riot", so something that's insightful could also be inciteful if you're inferring something embarrassing about someone to try to start a fight
Thanks, that guy.