this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)

NZ Politics

607 readers
28 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other kiwi communities here

 

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Given that it's extremely rare to have a single term government in NZ, to be polling behind the opposition not even half way through your term is a dramatic swing in public opinion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] terraborra@lemmy.nz 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Could you please outline how you think National brought down house prices?

I’m genuinely interested in your logic because I would have put it down to the recession, which would have happened regardless of who won the last election.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I mean, neither of them did all that much, but National helped pass the intensification bill, plus higher interest rates cooled things down.

I'm not sure what effect their other "free market" changes had, but it was mostly the economy, as well as the building industry catching up with demand.

[–] terraborra@lemmy.nz 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I agree that both of those things had an impact. However, the Enabling Housing Supply and Other Matters Bill was passed by the previous Labour government with support from National.

Interest rates are also set by the Reserve Bank which is almost wholly independent of the government of the day. The Minister can only appoint the Chairman but all monetary decisions are made by the monetary policy committee and politicians have no say over those decisions.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 2 points 6 days ago

You're right, very little of what National did helped, but labour achieved exactly the same thing.