this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
1335 points (98.8% liked)

Memes

49120 readers
1186 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Fair enough, but I would say that examining what went right and what went wrong is an imporant duty for any socialist examining the USSR not just dismissing it outright. Many of the issues and problems with Soviet Union can be applied to any country building socialism as can many of the benefits. So we must learn what to keep and what to leave aside, as it remained Socialist until the very end of its existence.

And for what it's worth, I reccommend that first link I sent. I think what I described in that could be useful for you.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i still think you're assuming what my actual, real-life views are from a silly what-if scenario! i am never gonna be in control of anything more powerful than a barbeque.

but if somehow i got to mind control the president or something, yes, i'd take advantage of that brief control to eliminate as many capitalists as possible

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You can't just kill Socialism into existence, though. That's Idealism, not Materialism. That removes the entire process of Historical Materialism, and erases the foundations of Scientific Socialism, as opposed to Utopianism. I recommend reading or revisiting Socialism: Utopian and Scientific.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i wouldn't be trying to will socialism into existence, though, i'd just be having a little fun :3

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's "tankier" than the "tankies" you demonize, though. Kinda just confused here.

[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ban this person for using a naughty word

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You got temp-banned from a different comm for breaking the rules, I don't think picking fights is a good usage of your time to be honest.

[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Just pointing out your hypocrisy.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That you yourself used a word I was banned for using, because apparently it's so insulting it shouldn't ever be used. And you will twist the truth in knots to defend the fact that I was punished just for using the word tankie. Oops. There I go again. But I guess its okay to use again since you're doing it.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty different context, I was asking for clarification from someone who used "tankie" unironically to ask them what they meant, you used it as an unironic insult, and further this is a different comm.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You understand the difference between actually using a word and referring to said word’s past usage by others, right?

[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hypocrisy? Yes I understand it very well.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)