this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
155 points (94.3% liked)

BuyFromEU

2555 readers
157 users here now

Welcome to BuyFromEU - A community dedicated to supporting European-made goods and services!

We also invite you to subscribe to:

Logo generated with mistral le chat Banner by Christian Lue on unsplash.com

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (12 children)

Is it possible to set up a signal server, or is it not completely FOSS?

[–] ueeu@social.vivaldi.net 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

@Valmond @SrMono

If you want to selfhost your own messenger, you can with Matrix or XMPP. XMPP, for ex, is the protocol used by WhatsApp.

Edited: removed Signal. Actually it seems it's the encryption tool (OMEMO) for XMPP that is based on Signal protocol.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Would my friends on signal be able to connect to that?

[–] ueeu@social.vivaldi.net 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

@Valmond @jerkface

Maybe we're wrong but for the moment they're not interoperable.

But the new European DMA regulation requires platforms to be interoperable. Meta and Apple are obliged now to open up their apps to communicate with smaller rival apps such as Signal. Apps using XMPP may be allowed to communicate with other apps in the future, although this seems to pose some security risks.

Some information about the requirement for interoperability between messengers:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/04/eu-digital-markets-acts-interoperability-rule-addresses-important-need-raises

@ueeu @Valmond @jerkface And I'm definitely not in favour of interoperability for a lot of things.

If I don't want to be on WhatsApp, Messenger, Threads, or whatever, why would I want my Signal messages to end up there?

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

XMPP, for ex, is the protocol used by WhatsApp and Signal.

Whaaaa, really??

load more comments (9 replies)