this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
490 points (98.6% liked)

politics

22048 readers
5635 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon revealed that MAGA operatives are "working on" securing Donald Trump a third presidential term in 2028, despite constitutional term limits.

In an interview with Chris Cuomo, Bannon said, "We'll see what the definition of term limit is," suggesting they're exploring ways to circumvent the 22nd Amendment.

Recently released from prison after serving four months for contempt of Congress, Bannon placed second in a CPAC straw poll for 2028 GOP nominees behind JD Vance, while maintaining tensions with Trump adviser Elon Musk.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.

That's the wording. It looks pretty iron clad, if you care at all about the rule of law.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That wording wouldn't prevent Trump from becoming Speaker of the House, and then becoming President for a third term through the line of succession.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shit, yeah re reading it it's fucked. Unless there is something that the scotus ruled on as president that is not worded directly.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't think it overly matters anyways, though; it's not like Republicans would go "Oh darn, foiled" if Trump couldn't be Speaker. Traitors gonna treason and coup, one way or another, and it's going to be boots-on-the-ground organizing that stops them, if anything stops them.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

100% correct, very unfortunately

[–] GoatTnder@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is that word "elected." It doesn't specifically exclude someone assuming the role of president through the line of succession.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, but the "acted as" should technically cover it. Again it's meaningless if laws no longer apply lol.

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's it. It's just a pretty idea with no bearing on reality if not enforced.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The sad reality

[–] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 day ago

Why else would the orange be challenging the constitution? His current play of changing birthright citizenship is a practice range so he knows how to aim at his real targets.