this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
138 points (94.2% liked)

United Kingdom

4709 readers
195 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Even with the caveats about limited data and untangling causation and correlation, the statistics are striking: the first year of a scheme in Wales where the speed limit on urban roads was lowered to 20mph resulted in about 100 fewer people killed or seriously injured.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Fantastic! wonder how people are adjusting? Walking more, pooling trips, or avoiding slow roads?

I wondered at the definition:

defined as roads where lamp-posts were no more than about 180 metres apart.

Will this result in worse lighting to avoid the reduced speed limit?

[–] sping 8 points 1 month ago

Not sure why they'd adjust. It's mostly urban areas where top speed makes little difference to journey times. Journey times are generally decided by how long you spend waiting at every light and intersection.

load more comments (2 replies)