this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
745 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

68639 readers
4740 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Well, some pedophiles have argued that AI generated child porn should be allowed, so real humans are not harmed, and exploited.

I'm conflicted on that. Naturally, I'm disgusted, and repulsed. I AM NOT ADVOCATING IT.

But if no real child is harmed...

I don't want to think about it, anymore.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Issue is, AI is often trained on real children, sometimes even real CSAM(allegedly), which makes the "no real children were harmed" part not necessarily 100% true.

Also since AI can generate photorealistic imagery, it also muddies the water for the real thing.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I didn't think about that.

The whole issue is abominable, and odious.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

that is still cp, and distributing CP still harms childrens, eventually they want to move on to the real thing, as porn is not satisfying them anymore.

[–] Schadrach 3 points 1 week ago

eventually they want to move on to the real thing, as porn is not satisfying them anymore.

Isn't this basically the same argument as arguing violent media creates killers?

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago
[–] quack@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Understand you’re not advocating for it, but I do take issue with the idea that AI CSAM will prevent children from being harmed. While it might satisfy some of them (at first, until the high from that wears off and they need progressively harder stuff), a lot of pedophiles are just straight up sadistic fucks and a real child being hurt is what gets them off. I think it’ll just make the “real” stuff even more valuable in their eyes.

[–] Corno@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I feel the same way. I've seen the argument that it's analogous to violence in videogames, but it's pretty disingenuous since people typically play videogames to have fun and for escapism, whereas with CSAM the person seeking it out is doing so in bad faith. A more apt comparison would be people who go out of their way to hurt animals.

[–] Schadrach 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A more apt comparison would be people who go out of their way to hurt animals.

Is it? That person is going out of their way to do actual violence. It feels like arguing someone watching a slasher movie is more likely to make them go commit murder is a much closer analogy to someone watching a cartoon of a child engaged in sexual activity or w/e being more likely to make them molest a real kid.

We could make it a video game about molesting kids and Postal or Hatred as our points of comparison if it would help. I'm sure someone somewhere has made such a game, and I'm absolutely sure you'd consider COD for "fun and escapism" and someone playing that sort of game is doing so "in bad faith" despite both playing a simulation of something that is definitely illegal and the core of the argument being that one causes the person to want to the illegal thing more and the other does not.

[–] misteloct@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Somehow I doubt allowing it actually meaningfully helps the situation. It sounds like an alcoholic arguing that a glass of wine actually helps them not drink.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I agree.

There's no helping actual pedophiles. That's who they are.