this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
159 points (97.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2770 readers
1125 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's kind of crazy to think how much value a homemaker creates, and then can be left with nothing to retire depending on personal circumstances.

"Homemakers" have their payments tied to their spouse's income to avoid this exact scenario. Including if they got divorced.

The reality is that SS was not designed to be a sole retirement income.

[–] MECHAGODZILLA2@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago

And the people they’ve kept a home for often then go on to be caretakers for them, thus completing the cycle of people we rely on the most while providing the least.