11
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
11 points (92.3% liked)
Australian Politics
1280 readers
76 users here now
A place to discuss Australia Politics.
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australia (general)
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
As recently as a decade ago, I might have been convinced that Nuclear was viable, if not Plan-A.
But, renewable energy has come so far in that time! It would have been the wrong call, and it's absolutely the wrong call today. The price per kW generated is a fraction of what Nuclear costs. That's before you get to the many, many negatives of Nuclear.
I honestly don't understand how renewable energy generation has become a party position.
Serving entrenched interests. Preserving their profits in the short term and giving them more time to limit their losses from transition to renewables.
Advocating for nuclear is the same, probably just another tactic to delay on renewables. To the degree that it goes anywhere, though, it'll be funneling tonnes of government money to large entrenched interests (feasibility studies, industry framework design, reactor facility design, or the unlikely event of actual construction).
Don't forget that they'd also have to admit they were wrong if they go with renewables, and that can never happen.