No? We just gonna sit around and let Nazi Germany 2.0 happen? Maybe waggle your finger a bit at them? Cool. Yeah. Okay. I love our leaders, they're so commited to the freedom and wellbeing of their people.

God I wish the Red Army was here to save our asses like last time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com -4 points 3 months ago (31 children)

"They have enough defensive capabilities to have a good chance of defeating a US invasion"

Lol, you really believe that? If the US wanted to, they could go into Iranian airspace and take out whatever they wanted to and leave without Iran even being able to detect them.

[+] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 43 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

[deleted]

[–] MarxusMaximus@hexbear.net 20 points 3 months ago (8 children)

I find it really hard to argue that the US lost in Libya or Iraq.

[–] AcidSmiley@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't call it "winning" when your invasion leads to nothing but state collapse, formation of ISIS and US troops getting merced by IEDs. Regional instability may be an outcome the US can live with, but it wasn't the military goal of the invasion, they wanted to turn Iraq into a regional ally like postwar Germany and they didn't come anywhere close to that.

[–] MarxusMaximus@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago

What's the evidence for that being the goal of the invasion? The US invaded Iraq to loot the country and destabilize the region. What's my evidence for this? It happened. It's what they did.

I wouldn't call it "winning" when your invasion leads to nothing but state collapse, formation of ISIS and US troops getting merced by IEDs.

I don't see how any of these things are bad for the American ruling class.

load more comments (6 replies)

load more comments (27 replies)