this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
423 points (96.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

39957 readers
1113 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For example I'll send an e-mail with 3 questions and will only get an answer to one of the questions. It's worse when there are 2 yes/no questions with a question that is obviously not a yes/no question. Then I get a response of

Yes

back in the e-mail. So which question are they answering?

Mainly I'm asking all of you why do people insist on only answering 1 question out of an e-mail where there are multiple? Do people just not read? Are people that lazy? What is going on?

Edit at this point I’ve got the answers . Some are too lazy to actually read. Some admit they get focused on one item and forget to go back. I understand the second group. The first group yeah no excuse there.

Continuing edit: there are comments where people have tried the bullet points and they say it still doesn’t help. I might put the needed questions in red.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This. Use bullets or bold each question so the number of questions is clear before each question is fully read.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago (4 children)

In a workplace environment, I shouldn't have to format emails as if they're to be read by a 12 year old.

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Welcome to the workforce! (I’m assuming you’re new…)

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

No, just very stubborn

[–] ThisIsNotHim@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's not simply a reading comprehension thing with bullet points. If your questions require research on my end having them already structured in bullets does a few things to help with that process.

The asker's bullet structure gives something to mimic. You can even put your answers directly below the question, so the asker can be reminded of their own questions.

The bullets also help skimming, if I need to see which item id is needed next it's easier to do so without losing my place.

Bullet grammar structure also allows for much terser sentences. If I need to reread your question it's easier if I don't have to ignore a bunch of words that don't substantively alter the meaning.

Do I need any of these? No. Could I put the questions into bullets myself for the reply? Sure. But it's easier to spend more time and effort on answering your questions if you save me a few steps.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

Sure, depending on the issue. But the main issue is that some people actually DO need those, and for those people, it's absolutely a reading comprehension thing (which could have roots in being overworked, not caring, low attention span, poor schooling, any number of things, but the end result is poor reading comprehension).

[–] joshthewaster@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you don't care enough about the topic to take a few seconds to proofread and format your questions why would I care to decipher them? 12 year olds learn that taking the time to write a first and second draft will improve the final product.

Definitely some acceptable variation between informal chats and emails being sent to whole teams so know your audience.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Who said anything about not proofreading? My emails are perfectly legible and written in proper English. You're equating "lack of dumbed-down easy to digest bullet points" with "sloppy, error-filled writing". They're two extremely different things.

[–] Kaput@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I should not have to read emails as if they're written by 12 years old either.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Agreed, and also a non sequitur?

[–] Kaput@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Not non sequitur - Chiasmus

Yeah I had to look them up.