this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
89 points (97.8% liked)

sino

8239 readers
19 users here now

This is a comm for news, information, and discussion on anything China and Chinese related.

Rules:

  1. Follow the Hexbear Code Of Conduct.

  2. Imperialism will result in a ban.

  3. Sinophobic content will be removed.


Newcomer Welcome Wiki


FAQ:


China Guides:


Multimedia:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KurtVonnegut@hexbear.net 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"The most successful socialist nation in history isn't doing things exactly the way I, an ignorant western leftist, think are morally pure. Therefore they are evil!"

Brilliant take, sir.

[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I get your contempt, but there's a fair and lively discussion regarding Chinese socialism. Calling oneself socialist while dealing with Israel and while not struggling harder against the yoke of western Imperialism, is morally difficult. If it all ends up in socialism and China actually pulls through with Marxism, anti-imperialism and socialism, then maybe it will be worth it, but I don't see a problem with criticising the morally gray parts of Chinese socialism.

[–] CutieBootieTootie@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The issue is that you then play into anti-communist narratives if your critiques are as simple as "China should already be a 100% socialist economy or else it's not ruled by a socialist government". Westerners who level such base critiques often do not have the full understanding of history, let alone Chinese history, that got the world's largest communist party to this point. This is a simple case of western chauvanism ahistorically abusing the most progressive nations in the world for not measuring up to their grade of "progress" which has been used time and time again to attack those who've done the most to bring a better world.

[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I agree with you and hold hopes for the future in regards to China, and that this is often brandished in public opinion as an anticommunist argument. That said, mindful discussion of these moral standards (which other countries like the USSR or Cuba have generally observed) and the future we want from China is a good thing in my opinion within leftist spaces

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I asked a genuine question on the last time this article was posted and was insulted and down voted. Your "take" contains more assumptions than my snarky comment on this post.

Brilliant... uh, take?

[–] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We don't have downvotes, so uhhh

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The other sub this article was posted in does have down votes. I was referring to that post.

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

then why are you asking people on this instance about something that happened on another instance?

[–] KurtVonnegut@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"I have depicted my snarky comment as the Chad wojak, and your snarky comment as the Soy wojak. I am victorious."

Real question: would you rather live in:

  1. a country with billionaires and a strong welfare state helping its citizens

  2. a country with billionaires and NO welfare state that lets its citizens suffer and die?

In this example, 1) is China, 2) is the USA. There is no third option, not at this point in human history. So tell me, which is better? 1 or 2?