96

archive.today • U.S. to Fund a $1.2 Billion Effort to Vacuum Greenhouse Gases From the Sky - The New York Times

I didn't read the article but I did scan it and I saw this...

Oil and gas companies lobbied for the direct air capture money to be included in the law, arguing that the world could continue to burn fossil fuels if it had a way to clean up their planet-warming pollution.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

there's no (thermodynamics issue) with the idea that it would take less energy to capture CO2 and store it somewhere than the CO2 released in that energy's production.

That's the issue, we don't have the technology to do that at scale, the law of thermodynamics looks far away at a micro level, but at the macro it teleports behind you and sucker punches you

It's all about scalability and its relationship to the law

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

but at the macro it teleports behind you and sucker punches you

Pshht... nothing... personnel, climate! no-copyright

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
96 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13491 readers
928 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS