96

archive.today • U.S. to Fund a $1.2 Billion Effort to Vacuum Greenhouse Gases From the Sky - The New York Times

I didn't read the article but I did scan it and I saw this...

Oil and gas companies lobbied for the direct air capture money to be included in the law, arguing that the world could continue to burn fossil fuels if it had a way to clean up their planet-warming pollution.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rom@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And they're 100% going to use this as an excuse to not scale back the burning of fossil fuels in the slightest. Because they'll try literally anything else before going after capital.

Edit: wait nvm, they already directly said that lmao

Oil and gas companies lobbied for the direct air capture money to be included in the law, arguing that the world could continue to burn fossil fuels if it had a way to clean up their planet-warming pollution.

dammit where's our guillotine emojis when you need them

[-] wrecker_vs_dracula@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

I think on the Internet we call that “mask off”. Notice that they use the term “fossil fuels” instead of “carbon fuels”. They have no vision of participating in an energy revolution that replaces fossil fuels. I could swear there was a trans flag guillotine emoji.

[-] PandaBearGreen@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

That's a bingo.

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
96 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13491 readers
928 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS