196
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
view the rest of the comments
Using a validating, non vaguely-male term is great, though!
Most of the terms are like: "these are MALE terms and also girls can be 'one of the bros' in certain circumstances"... but that's just not what transition is about.
We don't want to be "just one of the bros"; you gotta understand that:
a) that's NOT what a lot of us after,
b) the world doesn't revolve around men and being men and being masculine (and perpetuating that male chauvinism perspective is shitty),
and c) it's okay to call girls, girls, and to be a woman. That isn't a negative or lesser or othering l thing, despite how much of society raises us to believe.
I'm also not saying that we don't want to be included wherever we feel comfortable fitting in, we absolutely do. And I think a lot of allies understand that. But just as many allies understand that trans women feel left out from being included in feminine spaces, as well. And sometimes, while we may fit in better with the bros, way more than the girls, that itself can feel awful and really get the dysphoria going. Sometimes though, some of us realize that the dudes that are bros we realize are hot and dumb and we want to be closer to them for... different reasons.
Personally, I'm poly and pan and just want everybody to get along and not have weird stereotypically forced gender segregated hobbies, interests, and cliques anymore because that's weird and uncomfy. I don't even know what I'm talking about anymore I haven't eaten today yet. Homie is fine, I guess, but borderline, personally. I don't know a better replacement.
I'm a person who calls everyone "dude", "bro", "man" etc. regardless of gender. When I talk to a woman using those words, my mentality isn't that they are necessarilly "one of the bros" specifically meaning "similar to one of my male friends", but more that I've never called anyone "sis" or "girl" in my life, and I'm not about to start. I also don't like using gendered pronouns in any conversation, regardless of who I'm talking to. For example, instead of "him" or "her", I will usually say " 'em" (short for them).
To me, I am not talking to a man or a woman; I am talking to a human.
With my transfem friends, though, I usually just call them by their name, since that seems to be a good compromise.
Who knows. Maybe I'll just start calling everyone "comrade"
I appreciate your sense of trying to do right, but you should really not degender people, as that's a thing that transphobes do when trying to not be seen as a transphobe. Degendering is very similar to misgendering, btw, in that it doesn't respect the person's pronouns, and thus is attempting to discredit their gender.
If you're truly gender-abolitionist and (I will optimistically assume) race-abolitionist, and don't want to have gender be part of you, congruently, maybe don't use dude or bro at all anymore? Would you kiss a dude or a bro? Or did that question make you mentally imagine a masculine person?
I dunno. If I met a person in real life that truly never used he or she pronouns, and included me in that, I would probably be okay with it. But if they weren't consistent and they just used it around me or with other trans people, I would have a huge problem with it. Because the crux of the problem would be whether or not they are truly trying to change everything, or if they just cannot see me as a woman and are trying not to be hurtful without trying to understand.
I notice a lot of corporate-like personalities try to do this by hedging their language. It always feels spineless and shitty, they are NOT trying to change everything, they're just trying to manipulate everybody so that they can HAVE everything.
Gender, race, nationality, and country abolishionist.
I would love an alternative, but the colloquial American English language does not have casual, non-gendered words to refer to people in general other than "comrade", but I don't want to call everyone a comrade because then everyone will think I'm a communist (I am, but I don't want that to be public).
folks, friend(s), y'all, sweetie, sugarcube, partner, sport, buddy, pal, chum, sunshine, fam
English has quite a few
I find buddy and pal way more gendered (to me) than dude, tbh
I'm fine with being called dude, it makes me feel like a chill homegirl. But you call me "bud" and I'll want to punch you.
Thanks Super, saw surprises on the list & helps to have someone jump in for contrast, digest it all in a well-rounded way
Very thoughtful discussion y’all
That's strange. Not saying right or wrong, but in my head, dude is like a cowboy, overly masculine, like literally more masculine than calling somebody a mister. But then it got appropriated by guys (meaning men/boys) over the years and eventually got used for referring to somebody else that was a guy, and never girls. Like a good ole boys club that all men were a part of. And over time started getting used on tomboys and masc women, and I guess that and 'bro' started getting used on girls, too. Which is, optimistically, great. Except homophobia still exists and a lot of guys who would hear "bro that likes to help out their bro" is still commonly used to mean something homosexual.
Bud or Buddy, or pal are the same vein, they're still absolutely masculine, could be used in place of friend but are still masculine or desexualizing. A LOT of language is crazy homophobic.
I think a large part of the issue here may be actually the homophobia, and that calling trans girls bros or dudes, and why that's invalidating, may be because of homophobia and how by coding them as a traditionally desexualized name and that being more comfortable to most guys might be because they're uncomfortable with seeing trans women as women, and thus a sexual option. It validates the trans woman as a chill friend person, but says no I refuse to see you in any way sexual, be it straight OR gay (but especially straight/het) because transphobia and homophobia.
I then presume the question(s):
Is there correlation with those trans girls okay with being called dude and whether or not they are interested, sexually, in men?
What about, then, if there's a correlation between being about to intuit that deep connection? There are also many connections in that logic on the way that simply may not exist.
Or maybe a free mind, free from self imposed homophobia or transphobia?
Or, one that DOES have those self impositions?
An alien, new to our language, culture, and existential limitations would not know or care about such nuances of being called "dude" unless they had previously been subject to categorization and the bigotry of human culture. So, what then, is the difference between an entirely ignorant alien - a seemingly blank slate, and those of us that feel something's off when being called dude, even when the speaker professes beneficence?
To answer that, would require a sample of considered answers from various trans women to why they're offended by it, and then drilling down to see what lies beneath.
Unfortunately, this platform is not the place for said incredibly private and sensitive affairs. So this conversation effectively must come to an intellectual dead end, replaced by an alternative, shallower treatment of minimizing collateral invalidation and emotional minimization: if somebody says you're doing something that truly bothers them, you should stop. Don't try to justify why it shouldn't bother them, that's intrusive, controlling, and hurtful, and is an attempt to invalidate their feelings.
Only if both people want to continue to drill down, respectfully, examining the values of their own perspectives and value in pursuing continued use or dislike of use of the term, should that happen.
But like.... definitely don't trample somebody's dignity. That's bullshit behavior and is worth punching somebody for.
...Giving me flashbacks to that Mercedes Lackey book that tried to make "singular y'all" a thing, work characters in Appalachia. (I'm told it's a thing further west, but for Appalachian characters it was nails on a chalkboard). 💜
I don't know about any of that other stuff, but y'all is absolutely you+all, and to me is explicitly referring to other people, meaning more than one. You could do y'all for somebody who is a DiD system maybe.
Yeah, that's how I had to think of the main character, as a person containing multiple personalities. The author I mentioned is a Brit living in Oklahoma, and I think that's where The Internet™ told me some folks use "singular y'all". I grew up in Kentucky and it wasn't a thing there.
Lol "sugarcube". But yeah, maybe I should take a page from Canadians.
haha, figured it was a thing but all I see is urban dictionary