rockSlayer

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 14 hours ago

Peak mildly interesting, bravo

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 20 hours ago (12 children)

Why does that matter?

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 20 hours ago (14 children)

So why are you against the steam controller making sounds? It doesn't have a speaker, the noises it makes are from the haptic feedback. It's the same principle

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 20 hours ago (16 children)

I bet you hate floppotron too

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I hope the first song that gets replicated is the turret opera from portal 2

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

So glad to be back on my home instance! I noticed while I was on one of my alts that the comment I made right before the outage had a different amount of votes. Are we slow rolling sync with other servers, or is this just normal behavior?

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 days ago (4 children)

No, none of those guys are involved afaik. The one that made the first breakthrough in artificial life is ran by the same dude who competed with the Human Genome Project to map 99% of the human genome. They modified an extremely simple bacteria that only had something like 300 base pairs

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I'm a data analyst at a medical nonprofit, primarily doing analyses on germline variants for rare forms of cancer. I'm new to this kind of work, but had a decent educational background in biology.

Something I've learned is that genetics are complicated as hell. A single gene can produce multiple different proteins, and proteins change over time due to somatic variation. Only 1% of the genome are protein coding, called exomes. Exomes can be affected by variations to start and stop codons, non coding regions, and untranslated regions. There are entire fields dedicated to studying genome-wide, exomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, phenomics, and probably several others that I don't know about. The amount of data involved with these fields is in the tebibytes region. Have you ever seen a "small" 3GiB csv? I have. The filtered and cleaned data frames created by genetics are over 100 columns wide and have nearly 5 million entries.

There are companies creating artificial life by generating custom chromosomes. There's a whole field of computer science dedicated to biological computing, using DNA as a storage medium. There are companies dedicated to simply classifying genes.

DNA is cool as hell.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I just checked Microsoft's website. They're trying to make windows enterprise a subscription model. The current cost for what they're calling "windows 365" is $99/yr per user. They're saving nearly $250 million a year, or €211 Million

Seeing that picture of Siddig makes me want Star Trek: House

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Not all ace people are sex repulsed.

 

Before I start my little rant, I want to speak to the liberals in the wall. I am not, nor have I ever been, a sovcit. Anarchists and sovcits share a resentment for these documents, but that's where the resemblance ends.

I'm a prominent union organizer within my industry (tech) and was recently extended the offer to travel to California to represent my union at a conference next month. I love going to union conferences, so of course I accepted. That's when I remembered that my passport is expired by a couple years, and I further realized that I don't have a real id. So now I need to get a new passport.

I decided that I want a passport card along with my book, because a card would be easier to carry for this conference. This shit is expensive! $130 for renewal, $30 for the card, and $60 for the expedited processing. $220 total. I fucking hate that I need to register with the government to travel. I fucking hate that I need to surrender my privacy to this fascist regime. I fucking hate that my only option for fast travel is by plane. I fucking hate borders.

 

Did you reach a neat milestone? Did you accomplish something? Did you find a better way to do something? Did you manage to get out of bed? Great work, celebrate it at !littlewins@lemmy.blahaj.zone!

There's so much doom and gloom throughout the world lately, that it can be hard to remember that good things are still happening. Joy is resistance, so shine on!

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/41873102

Wizards have joined the party!

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/41873102

Wizards have joined the party!

 

Wizards have joined the party!

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/41766106

I think when people see something wrong and want to make a change, they're often wondering where to begin and what to even say. This is an example of how do it: I follow these patterns when I don't know what to say. I also gave advice and insights I've learned over the years at the bottom of the post.

About my credentials: I was able to build 1/6 of our union support and built the entire organizing committee on my own using this method in a 600 person union, and was generally seen as the face of the cause throughout the entire company. For those curious, I plan to get a tattoo of our union logo. I'm a union steward within the workplace and currently the chair of my local's organizing committee.

I'd be glad to answer any questions in the comments, happy May Day everyone!

You: hey, do you have a moment to talk? Could we have lunch together today?

Them: sure, I can do that.

You: ok great! Do you want to meet up at the elevator/break room/restaurant at 12?

Them: ok sounds good.

It's 12pm and they show up.

You: Hey thanks for meeting up! How are things going?

Them: not bad. I'm feeling a little tired considering the overtime they've been forcing on us to meet the deadline.

You: yea, it's been crazy. I haven't been able keep up with my normal hobbies because of it, it just feels like I'm going between work and bed. Have you been missing out on things?

Them: Yea, I have been. I had to miss a friend's birthday party last week.

You: that sucks! I've been talking to some coworkers and a lot of us feel like they're taking advantage of us. Have you heard from mutual friend/one of their friends/an individual/anyone about this?

Them: no I haven't. Have you?

You: no, I was just wondering. Have you thought about asking them to stop the OT?

Them: well of course I have, but I doubt it would make a difference.

You: yea, they'd probably ignore us if just you or I asked them to stop. But what do you think they'd do if we all said something?

Them: lol well then they'd probably have to listen to us!

You: absolutely! Like I mentioned, some of us were talking. We were thinking about giving a letter to our manager. Do you want to read it?

Them: sure.

You: ok great.

You show them the letter

You: so what do you think?

Them: it's interesting. Do you think it would work?

You: I don't know, but I hope it does. There's really only one way to find out, and it's to try. The worst they can say is no.

Them: well, I don't know. This could get us in trouble.

You: I thought so too, but I looked it up and found out that it would be illegal for them to punish us for doing this. I can send you the links if you want.

Them: oh really? I'd like to see those please.

You: sure, I'll send them to you.

Them: thanks. So let's say it's true, why would you come to me?

You: because your voice is important. I respect what you think, and I think that the company should actually listen to us when we have something to say. Don't you agree?

Them: yea I do. That's a good point.

You: so what do you think?

Them: it seems interesting. Maybe it's worth a shot.

You: do you want to sign the letter?

Them: I don't know, can I think about it? I want to look at those links first.

You: yea, absolutely. Do you want to meet up again on date and we can talk about it some more?

Them: sure.

As seen in this scenario, you need a cause to rally around on your way to building a union. Causes can come from anything. Perhaps you got in trouble for making a mistake and you suggested a change to avoid it from happening again, but it goes ignored. Maybe the company is sued for sexual harassment. It could be that they raised the quota. They might have cut the pay, raised the hours, or otherwise reduced the benefits. Things could be totally fine and there are no complaints, but you want to keep it that way. Layoffs are an incredibly powerful organizing tool. The options are endless. Be creative!

I'm focusing on on union organizing because that's my organizing experience, but this can be adapted to any kind of organizing.

I want to point out that by keeping the invite vague, you get the bonus of usually grabbing people's curiosity. The conversation is most effective in getting support when arranging to meet up in person, but you can totally adapt the scenario into asking them join zoom, take a call, or communicating any other way you can think of. You can deliver this invitation over company comms without raising suspicion by keeping it vague. In fact, using company comms was how I invited people most of the time. However if people ask what you want to talk about, keep it honest but as vague as possible. The invitation can and should be generalized to remain the same between coworkers, and then genuinely respond when you get an answer. Trust me, it will conserve a lot of precious effort for other tasks while working behind the scenes. Scheduled messages are your friend! DON'T USE THE COMPANY COMMS to actually have the conversation, if at all possible. Take the conversation off work comms as soon as possible and at all costs, but sometimes it can't be avoided. You can sweeten the offer to get off work comms with information gating, like "sorry I can't answer that question over slack, but I can explain it on a call/on signal/over text".

If they don't show up or follow through, it's ok to politely ask what happened. We're all adults, we should expect people to stick to their word. I recommend doing this in the same manner as the invitation, but do it however you see fit.

I'm writing this person as being a coworker friend or at least somewhat familiar with you, but don't be surprised if coworkers you don't really know open up to you in this age of isolation! Follow your coworker's lead! You can and should have some things prepared to talk about for the conversation, but if they bring something up then you should follow along. If they say they don't want to talk about it, drop it unless they bring it back up. You can and should influence the direction of the conversation via the invitation, but sometimes they want to talk about something else. Don't shut it down, because information from coworkers is literally priceless in the overall goal of forming a union. I actually prefer it when people cut to the chase or give a cold/one word response like 'fine', because it gives me more control of the conversation and can be focused more easily. When it happens don't feel awkward, just pivot with something like "so, I wanted to talk about this thing."

Honesty is the best policy, but use discretion. Don't reveal sensitive details or mention someone that wants to stay low profile. Asking about other coworkers also serves as a feeler; you could be trying to find out about that person's sympathies, the person you ask about could be anti-union, or they could be a fellow organizer.

A little flattery goes a long way!

When the meeting ends like in this scenario, make sure you follow up with them. Send reminders. At a minimum, double check that they're still available on the day of. While this conversation ended with someone on the fence about signing the letter, sometimes people will commit, and sometimes they volunteer for more than you anticipated. You should limit your calls to action to around 3 and stop as soon as they hesitate, otherwise people will feel like you're dumping a bunch of responsibilities onto them; note that this script had 2 calls to action. You should ask them in order of how much effort is involved: you started with a very simple ask of them to read something, and then you asked them to get informed about their rights while considering signing the letter. If they had committed to signing, then you could always invite them to your next meeting. When you give a call to action, you should be direct and ask a yes/no question. Leave no wiggle room for "maybe". Do not speak again until they give you an answer.

 

I think when people see something wrong and want to make a change, they're often wondering where to begin and what to even say. This is an example of how do it: I follow these patterns when I don't know what to say. I also gave advice and insights I've learned over the years at the bottom of the post.

About my credentials: I was able to build 1/6 of our union support and built the entire organizing committee on my own using this method in a 600 person union, and was generally seen as the face of the cause throughout the entire company. For those curious, I plan to get a tattoo of our union logo. I'm a union steward within the workplace and currently the chair of my local's organizing committee.

I'd be glad to answer any questions in the comments, happy May Day everyone!

You: hey, do you have a moment to talk? Could we have lunch together today?

Them: sure, I can do that.

You: ok great! Do you want to meet up at the elevator/break room/restaurant at 12?

Them: ok sounds good.

It's 12pm and they show up.

You: Hey thanks for meeting up! How are things going?

Them: not bad. I'm feeling a little tired considering the overtime they've been forcing on us to meet the deadline.

You: yea, it's been crazy. I haven't been able keep up with my normal hobbies because of it, it just feels like I'm going between work and bed. Have you been missing out on things?

Them: Yea, I have been. I had to miss a friend's birthday party last week.

You: that sucks! I've been talking to some coworkers and a lot of us feel like they're taking advantage of us. Have you heard from mutual friend/one of their friends/an individual/anyone about this?

Them: no I haven't. Have you?

You: no, I was just wondering. Have you thought about asking them to stop the OT?

Them: well of course I have, but I doubt it would make a difference.

You: yea, they'd probably ignore us if just you or I asked them to stop. But what do you think they'd do if we all said something?

Them: lol well then they'd probably have to listen to us!

You: absolutely! Like I mentioned, some of us were talking. We were thinking about giving a letter to our manager. Do you want to read it?

Them: sure.

You: ok great.

You show them the letter

You: so what do you think?

Them: it's interesting. Do you think it would work?

You: I don't know, but I hope it does. There's really only one way to find out, and it's to try. The worst they can say is no.

Them: well, I don't know. This could get us in trouble.

You: I thought so too, but I looked it up and found out that it would be illegal for them to punish us for doing this. I can send you the links if you want.

Them: oh really? I'd like to see those please.

You: sure, I'll send them to you.

Them: thanks. So let's say it's true, why would you come to me?

You: because your voice is important. I respect what you think, and I think that the company should actually listen to us when we have something to say. Don't you agree?

Them: yea I do. That's a good point.

You: so what do you think?

Them: it seems interesting. Maybe it's worth a shot.

You: do you want to sign the letter?

Them: I don't know, can I think about it? I want to look at those links first.

You: yea, absolutely. Do you want to meet up again on date and we can talk about it some more?

Them: sure.

As seen in this scenario, you need a cause to rally around on your way to building a union. Causes can come from anything. Perhaps you got in trouble for making a mistake and you suggested a change to avoid it from happening again, but it goes ignored. Maybe the company is sued for sexual harassment. It could be that they raised the quota. They might have cut the pay, raised the hours, or otherwise reduced the benefits. Things could be totally fine and there are no complaints, but you want to keep it that way. Layoffs are an incredibly powerful organizing tool. The options are endless. Be creative!

I'm focusing on on union organizing because that's my organizing experience, but this can be adapted to any kind of organizing.

I want to point out that by keeping the invite vague, you get the bonus of usually grabbing people's curiosity. The conversation is most effective in getting support when arranging to meet up in person, but you can totally adapt the scenario into asking them join zoom, take a call, or communicating any other way you can think of. You can deliver this invitation over company comms without raising suspicion by keeping it vague. In fact, using company comms was how I invited people most of the time. However if people ask what you want to talk about, keep it honest but as vague as possible. The invitation can and should be generalized to remain the same between coworkers, and then genuinely respond when you get an answer. Trust me, it will conserve a lot of precious effort for other tasks while working behind the scenes. Scheduled messages are your friend! DON'T USE THE COMPANY COMMS to actually have the conversation, if at all possible. Take the conversation off work comms as soon as possible and at all costs, but sometimes it can't be avoided. You can sweeten the offer to get off work comms with information gating, like "sorry I can't answer that question over slack, but I can explain it on a call/on signal/over text".

If they don't show up or follow through, it's ok to politely ask what happened. We're all adults, we should expect people to stick to their word. I recommend doing this in the same manner as the invitation, but do it however you see fit.

I'm writing this person as being a coworker friend or at least somewhat familiar with you, but don't be surprised if coworkers you don't really know open up to you in this age of isolation! Follow your coworker's lead! You can and should have some things prepared to talk about for the conversation, but if they bring something up then you should follow along. If they say they don't want to talk about it, drop it unless they bring it back up. You can and should influence the direction of the conversation via the invitation, but sometimes they want to talk about something else. Don't shut it down, because information from coworkers is literally priceless in the overall goal of forming a union. I actually prefer it when people cut to the chase or give a cold/one word response like 'fine', because it gives me more control of the conversation and can be focused more easily. When it happens don't feel awkward, just pivot with something like "so, I wanted to talk about this thing."

Honesty is the best policy, but use discretion. Don't reveal sensitive details or mention someone that wants to stay low profile. Asking about other coworkers also serves as a feeler; you could be trying to find out about that person's sympathies, the person you ask about could be anti-union, or they could be a fellow organizer.

A little flattery goes a long way!

When the meeting ends like in this scenario, make sure you follow up with them. Send reminders. At a minimum, double check that they're still available on the day of. While this conversation ended with someone on the fence about signing the letter, sometimes people will commit, and sometimes they volunteer for more than you anticipated. You should limit your calls to action to around 3 and stop as soon as they hesitate, otherwise people will feel like you're dumping a bunch of responsibilities onto them; note that this script had 2 calls to action. You should ask them in order of how much effort is involved: you started with a very simple ask of them to read something, and then you asked them to get informed about their rights while considering signing the letter. If they had committed to signing, then you could always invite them to your next meeting. When you give a call to action, you should be direct and ask a yes/no question. Leave no wiggle room for "maybe". Do not speak again until they give you an answer.

 

I like my job, so no screenshots. Sorry.

Notes:

  • sbatch is a command for submitting jobs on high performance compute nodes
  • the huge-n128-512g node uses 128 cores and has 512GiB of memory
  • This is occurring in a medical research nonprofit

User: Hello everyone, this is the first time I'm using GCP. I'm trying to run a job, but it keeps failing. These are the sbatch headers I'm using:

#SBATCH --partition=huge-n128-512g
#SBATCH --nodes=8
#SBATCH --mail-user=user@institute.org
#SBATCH --mail-type=FAIL
#SBATCH --mem-per-cpu=32G

IT: Please make sure you need to use that node, each one costs $4500/month to use. Can you describe the job you're trying to do?

User: I'm doing high-depth genetic sequencing using 3gb bam files.

(additional note: there's usually only 1 bam file per chromosome, so 69gb total. Nice.)

IT: Those bam files are pretty small. I'd recommend starting with the med-n16-64g node and moving up if needed. We're only billed for run time. If the jobs take the same amount of time, it would be 13% of the cost.

The astute among you will notice that an 8 node swarm of 32GiB of memory per core is 32TiB total. The job was failing because the --mem-per-cpu flag was going above the available memory on each node. Even without that flag, the swarm would have used 4TiB memory. Holy overallocation, Batman!

view more: next ›