this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
30 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13903 readers
1011 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

they always go after the children. i get it, since children are basically exclusively viewed as property, but honestly what the fuck could possibly be more evil?

Names of the contributors to the review are not initially being made public

oh yeah i fucking bet.

e: skimming it and it's absolutely fucking evil. it's also weirdly catty

cw: transphobia obviouslyA central theme of this Review is that many U.S. medical professionals and associations have fallen short of their duty to prioritize the health interests of young patients. First, there was a rapid expansion and implementation of a clinical protocol that lacked sufficient scientific and ethical justification. Second, when confronted with compelling evidence that this protocol did not deliver the health benefits it promised, and that other countries were changing their policies appropriately, U.S. medical professionals and associations failed to reconsider the “gender-affirming” approach. Third, conflicting evidence—evidence that challenged the foundational assumptions of the protocol and the professional standing of its advocates—was mischaracterized or insufficiently acknowledged. Finally, dissenting perspectives were marginalized, and those who voiced them were disparaged.