news
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
view the rest of the comments
So, digging through those articles, I immediately have some concerns.
The first study, funded by toothpaste manufacturers, found no statistically significant difference between random people who may or may not use proper brushing technique being handed a dry brush with no dentifrice and being handed a wet brushing with no dentifrice. The second study was a meta-analysis of other trials that also has the same problems: brushing technique was not a controlled variable, and all tested dentifrices contained SLS.
The big problem is that a lot of toothpastes contain surfactants like SLS or CAPB, which cause the toothpaste to foam and leave behind a smooth effect which is confusing to people. People specifically using a foaming dentifrice have a harder time discerning whether or not they've done an adequate job of removing plaque, hence the statistically insignificant but measurable difference in plaque removal between dry brushing without a dentifrice and wet brushing with one.
This definitely needs some more study we're never going to get because of capitalism.
I would argue that the issue with brushing technique is not relevant to the effectiveness study. Normal people are going to vary in technique. Controlling too strictly for technique does not realistically tell us which is more or less effective in practice. Likewise, we can't assume the toothpaste users where on average less effective or more effective than the toothpaste nonusers. Like I said, studies keep reinforcing this conclusion. At this point it's more than reasonable to assume the conclusion that toothpaste doesn't help with actual brushing is a pretty secure position.