this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
11 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

2257 readers
68 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We are going to hit an interesting spot in a few years when the processes run out of numbers to use - because the "x nm process" hasn't been talking about the actual sizes for almost three decades (the 250nm process back in 1997 was one of the last ones).

The "2nm" process for example has a gate pitch of 45nm, and metal pitch of 20nm. Once they go below 42 and 16 - 1nm values - is it going to be the 0nm process? And -1nm after that?

[โ€“] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Both Intel and TSMC have leveraged A (for Angstrom), as in 18A node, for their next generation nodes.