Selfhosted

60482 readers

820 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

356

Come to say thank you. Time to move from proprietary to Open Source (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by essell@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

85 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Thanks to this community I've learned and I'm feeling inspired. I've loved having an NAS for the last few years, but it's woefully under powered for what I'm using it for these days.

So I've ordered some basic PC parts, gonna build a basic setup using an old CPU I got lying about and try the NAS OS I saw talked about on here recently.

TrueNAS looks like a good option with only slight fears it'll go down the well known path to the dark side like so many free options before.

In any event, I'm looking forward to adding Nextcloud and Jellyfin, to trying out Docker and generally having more control over things.

Thanks again to you all for informing and inspiring.

I'll be back if I get questions!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Sproutling@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I used to do that. I had a QNAP NAS and a small Intel NUC running Arch that would host all my services. I would just mount the NAS folders via Samba into the NUC. Problem is that services can't watch the filesystem for changes. If I add a video to my Jellyfin directory, Jellyfin won't automatically initiate a scan.

Nowadays, I just combine them into one. Just seems simpler that way.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

I just have my downloader trigger a scan at completion.

I have a few proxmox clusters going, combining it all wouldn't be practical. This way my servers (tiny/mini/micros I've repurposed) stay small with decent sized ssd's, big storage in 2 NAS's, and a third for backups.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would just mount the NAS folders via Samba into the NUC. Problem is that services can’t watch the filesystem for changes. If I add a video to my Jellyfin directory, Jellyfin won’t automatically initiate a scan.

That sounds like a config issue. I use NFS shares in a similar way, and Plex/*arr/etc has zero issues watching for changes.

[–] Sproutling@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I think it's a samba limitation. Maybe NFS works well for that case.