this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
4 points (83.3% liked)
NZ Politics
665 readers
4 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!
This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi
This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick
Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
https://www.nzhuntingandshooting.co.nz/f65/register-stay-114724/
Edit
I don't think that the FA register is keeping people safer:
If you were going to commit familicide with a FA, having them registered is not going to stop that, and if you are a gang member or career criminal I doubt that getting a FAL and registering your FA would be high on your list of things to do
That is a seriously loaded post you linked. While I can find points I agree with, it's manipulative and has a clear agenda.
Here is one from the other side I could also describe the same way, and points to specifics for it's claims: https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/opinion/117347138/why-a-gun-register-will-make-us-safer
Is that a common thing in NZ? I would expect gun crime (e.g. burglary with a gun, gangs or adversaries shooting at each other, etc) would be a bigger portion and the sort of thing this is targeting.
However, if the police became aware of a threat like this they would at least know if there was a gun in the house.
This is what the fire arms register is there for. If you find someone with a gun and no licence, you know exactly how they got it. You can either trace it directly to a burglary, or you will find their known associate got it for them. The article Iinked points out most fire arm thefts are from careless owners leaving them unsecured, and having their name linked to the gun may encourage them to be more careful.
Personally I would like to see some more solid evidence about the impact of the register, but for minimal cost of running it and some extra paperwork when buying/selling I think it deserves to stick around until a clear trend emerges.
There is also the point that if police get called to a disturbance at an address, they will know if there are likely to be guns in the house.
Just adding on to this, I found this study of Australia's firearm reform.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Fatal-Firearm-Incidents-Before-and-After-1996-Chapman-Stewart/9146a5543654d64227c688abc8a1a821f665039c
Now this could easily be attributed to the other changes made. The study was not looking specifically at a register but at all the changes made:
I would welcome anyone that can find a study on gun registration independent of other changes, this is the closest I have found: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2022001/article/00009-eng.pdf
It shows after Canada ended registration for rifles and similar in 2012 gun crime rates slowly rose after slowly falling up to that point, but I am not convinced this is related (and the document makes no connection as far as I can tell). Canada still registers hand guns and similar, which are the main guns used in crime, so this is in no way definitive one way or the other.