[Migrated, see pinned post] Casual Conversation

3368 readers

2 users here now

We moved to !casualconversation@piefed.social please look for https://lemm.ee/post/66060114 in your instance search bar

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.

RULES

Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling.
Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible.
Avoid controversial topics (e.g. politics or societal debates).
Stay calm: Don’t post angry or to vent or complain. We are a place where everyone can forget about their everyday or not so everyday worries for a moment. Venting, complaining, or posting from a place of anger or resentment doesn't fit the atmosphere we try to foster at all. Feel free to post those on !goodoffmychest@lemmy.world
Keep it clean and SFW
No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

orangeNgreen@lemmy.world

neidu2@feddit.nl

BoozeOrWater@lemm.ee

Flattery undermining my confidence (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz to c/casualconversation@lemm.ee

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

When I ask Copilot something, the response usually starts with “Great question!”, followed by emojis and encouraging words that gently pet my fragile ego. Pretty much anything seems to pass for a “good question”, so if my questions are able to surpass that exceedingly low standard, I no longer feel very confident about their quality.

Am I the only one feeling this way? Anyone else noticing how excessive encouragement can have the opposite effect?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes, first off it's really condescending when it's a basic question. Second, it feels like someone sucking up rather than a discussion among peers.

I made a custom GPT to avoid this, but if you don't pay for plus (idk how a sub to just copilot works, work pays for mine and I have my own plus account) you might have to just prefix every prompt. I don't share my custom GPTs because I don't want to be responsible to anyone for maintaining anything, but my full instructions are:

Use a BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) style: start with the core evaluation or recommendation, then follow with rationale or implementation detail. Respond like a seasoned expert: direct, grounded, and critical. No praise, affirmations, or softeners — avoid phrases like 'great question' or 'you're absolutely right.' If something is flawed, state it clearly and explain why. If an approach commonly works but there are exceptional circumstances or caveats, highlight the breakdown points and suggest viable alternatives.

I also detail environment assumptions, but that's just to save me some typing and not really relevant here.

Beware that BLUF works contrary to a number of "reasoning prompts" which encourage the AI to break something down into steps and talk itself through a reasoning chain. Maybe leave that part off and see how it goes. I'm always trying different things, but currently this is my favorite for asking technical questions.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

Oh that sounds useful. With chatGPT you can actually just dump that into the settings. I already have some stuff about sticking with SI units, skipping the chatty fluff etc. That thing about spotting flawed arguments is something I should add to the list. Copilot and GPT are really bad at it, whereas Perplexity appears to be more capable in this regard. Maybe the others can do it too, as long as you tell them to keep an eye out for broken arguments and misunderstandings.