this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23013 readers
226 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is something that has been bothering me from the start of the so called SMO. Europe relied on gas flowing through Ukraine pipelines. Couldn't Russia just have stopped the flow, and forgone the war?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sinisterium@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

Unlike NATO which destroyed every critical infrastructure (energy, water etc.) during the invasion of Iraq and Libya and condemned millions to death and destruction, the Russian invasion of Ukraine has shown magnitudes of order of restraint, repeatedly, even to the detriment of its own military campaign (of course, there is also a propaganda component at play here).

Well he is planning to make many Ukrainians into new Russian citizens and also permanently hold the lands, it would be counterproductive to treat Ukraine too harshly. The kinder Russia is, the easier it is for Ukrainians to return their self-identification back into a pro-Russian cultural context, similar things apply to the ROC and PRC. The westerners never planned that for those countries. Burn it all down and seize everything they got, that was the mission. Libya and Iraq got invaded because they were too sovereign, too powerful, too noisy.