this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
29 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23062 readers
125 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've heard that the middle class doesn't exist, but I've also heard that the rising middle class was necessary for capitalism. Is there a principled definition, because China seems concerned about growing their middle class.

What does it mean to you, I guess?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GoodGuyWithACat@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago

Interesting, I was neglecting dialectics in my class analysis. I've never read Hegel proper.

I think this is the sort of thing I was looking for. Yes there are two great classes, but they do exist on a spectrum and the individual differences matter less than the general trends. Thus it's okay for the middle class to not have a specific, single definition.