this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
64 points (91.0% liked)

PC Gaming

11090 readers
445 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's all they do now. Copy paste Sequels and remasters.

Turns out some people want new exciting experiences and are such of the repetition. The industry focusing on these means less new stuff in an already barren wasteland of interesting games.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Game remasters have always existed, at roughly the same pace as we see today.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Given that NEW games are taking longer and longer to make. Remakes coming out at the same rate as always is a problem.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's an unprecedented number of new games being released every year, significantly more than any other point in gaming history, so you can't really use "new games are taking longer to release" as a premise.

And even if you were right, which isn't the case, I'm fairly certain a game like GTA VI is justified in taking longer to be developed and released compared to some dinky NES game where a character is 14 pixels tall.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This is where I point out that being able to retain the context of the conversation is helpful. I specified AAA titles. There being thousands of indie games of varying quality out there doesn't change the fact that AAA games are taking years to release, there's been a huge amount of publisher consolidation which always leads to studio closures, and them pushing these remakes/remasters is only adding to the staleness facing AAA

And your entire second paragraph is completely irrelevant to my point.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Yes, I'm talking about AAA titles - not Indies.

This is where I point out reading comprehension and not assuming your own conclusions summarise somebody else's argument are helpful.