577

How much would you pay for a PC with 128KB RAM, and no hard disk?

In today's money (inflation adjusted)

This an ad from Personal Computer World (UK) from 1985

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BrownianMotion@lemmy.world 58 points 11 months ago

So everything is about right. Today you can buy a budget pc, and skim on performance, but back then (and I was there man!) you could not.

In 1985 HDD were only starting to gain traction for PC's and that was about the only thing you could spec up. That IBM pc is "High Res" which probably means it was VGA multicolour (yay!lol) with 640x480 resolution. So you were basically buying top of the line.

Today, if you were to build a top of the line PC, RTX4090, latest best intel cpu, PSU, etc, etc it would be easy to spend $5K!

But damn, the difference in performance from back then to now!! (That IBM is an XT which means it was a 4.77Mhz with 8086 cpu. Just looking at that picture, I can feel the weight of the bloody thing)

[-] Oisteink@feddit.nl 15 points 11 months ago

I was there too but vga was not. My dad got an IBM XT fully specd as a home computer (he was CFO of Emma EDB). I believe the hires could be EGA or probably Hercules as they don’t brag about colours - but his had CGA. The full spec of my dads pc - that changed my life - was: 2x256kb ram on full length isa cards. 10mb hdd, 360kb floppy. 9pin printer and cga. Total cost back then in Norwegian KR was 120000.

[-] Oisteink@feddit.nl 6 points 11 months ago

After checking with my dad the price was half of what I stated. He got one for home and one for office - the business he was with was providing IBM mainframes, and wanted to check out the PC. My dad got them because of Lotus 1-2-3 - spreadsheets was the shit in accounting/ finance already

[-] BrownianMotion@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Might be right, could have been ega. It was a long time ago and the mind is wobbly.

[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

yea 8086 couldn't drive a vga. 16 preset ugly colors if you're lucky. unless you had a magical amiga with dedicated graphics chips to do 256 colors, 4096 if you're nasty.

[-] captain_samuel_brady@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sir, I’ll have you know that I had an IBM PS/2 Model 25 with 256 glorious colors in MCGA. And fuck every developer that didn’t support MCGA, because it dropped down to 4 color CGA if not. No support for EGA.

[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

and i'm sure you learned your valuable lesson :)

[-] captain_samuel_brady@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Almost certainly not as my next PC was a Gateway 2000.

[-] Loulou@lemmy.mindoki.com 1 points 11 months ago

Oh those raster hacks and stuff...

[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago

Also, these PCs back then were heavy (=>much more resource intensive), handbuilt and low-volume. All things that add a lot to the price.

[-] Loulou@lemmy.mindoki.com 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't know about resource intensive, today you need a frigging powerplant to feed a decent PC. At least the 286 and onwards didn't consume that much right?

Edit: It was not about running costs but the resources to Build them, and that's true for sure! Sorry!

[-] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I think they mean resource intensive as in it literally took more physical material to build them, which costs more.

[-] Loulou@lemmy.mindoki.com 2 points 11 months ago

Ah okay, that's totally true.

[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

Resource intensive to make. If you have a PC that consists of 20kg steel and other materials, that's gonna add to the price.

[-] Loulou@lemmy.mindoki.com 1 points 11 months ago
[-] Ferris@discuss.online 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

eh. Money is worth a third of what it was worth.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Today you can buy a budget pc, and skim on performance, but back then (and I was there man!) you could not.

For PCs? Maybe not, but you could get plenty of other types of home computer for reasonably cheap. A Commodore 64 was $150 in 1985, for instance. Just had to stay away from the absolute bleeding edge.

[-] nottheengineer@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

Adjusted for inflation, I'm pretty sure that today's PCs are still cheaper than this.

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
577 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

55919 readers
3908 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS