this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
24 points (96.2% liked)
United States | News & Politics
8202 readers
358 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The problem I have with the Starship concept is the fact that it is designed to carry the landing fuel onboard because it cannot land any other way. If it could glide down rather than thruster down, then maybe it wouldn't need to test the limits of physics.
Alternatively, if the thrusters are required for Mars and Lunar landing and take off, why not make an orbital dock and deploy the Starships there instead? It just seems like Space-X chose the flashiest and least efficient way to tackle the problem.
You are totally spot on. In trying to make starship doing everything, it turns out to do nothing particularly well. Sending up this much mass for so many of these failed tests is a total waste, and could’ve been better spent on an orbital dock.
SpaceX is doomed to fail because they’re barred from considering any planning or design that isn’t centered on ‘make Elon the first man on Mars.’ building the docks and infrastructure would extend the timeline into Elon’s old age, so they’re not acceptable for consideration.