Politics

793 readers

193 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

Rule 7. No conjecture type posts (this could, might, may, etc.). Only factual. If the headline is wrong, clarify within the body. More info

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

244

US Supreme Court denies an emergency request to keep their names private, from Seattle cops who went to Jan. 6 rally (www.seattletimes.com)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@sh.itjust.works

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The officers asked for the justices to stay a ruling from the Washington Supreme Court that said their identities could be revealed. The officers had sued the Seattle Police Department four years ago in King County Superior Court, identifying themselves as “John Does 1-4,” challenging the release of their names and details of an internal investigation into their attendance at the violent “Stop the Steal” political protest rally in Washington, D.C.

On Wednesday, U.S. Justice Samuel Alito authored a statement denying their request for an emergency action to keep them anonymous, writing the officers “have not adequately explained why at this point they still face an imminent danger of irreparable harm.”

That denial, Alito noted, was not necessarily an endorsement of the state Supreme Court’s decision or its interpretation of the First Amendment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

MAGA Cops: "We believe we're at risk of imminent, irreparable harm if the crimes we definitely committed aren't concealed by the courts."

Alito: "Oof. That's a little extreme, even for me."

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also Alito: "I agree with your desired outcome, so please buy me an RV first and you can get the blueprints directly like the rest of the oligarchy, or at least go through the Heritage Foundation since you're just brokie cops. Dogs must the obey rules."

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

wasnt the rv thing, thomas obsession.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Technically, yes, but Alito got similar bribes. He also defended Thomas and said some even worse things:

https://newrepublic.com/post/182605/samuel-alito-livid-clarence-thomas-exposed-shady-gifts

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

of course he did.

[–] Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

have not adequately explained why at this point they still face an imminent danger of irreparable harm.

I'm not sure if he meant it like this, but it sounds like "everyone got pardoned by the guy who started the coup, I don't understand what you're worried about at this point"

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

That's some good insight. It would be very on-brand for him.