Artificial Intelligence

1664 readers

5 users here now

Welcome to the AI Community!

Let's explore AI passionately, foster innovation, and learn together. Follow these guidelines for a vibrant and respectful community:

Be kind and respectful.
Share high-quality contributions.
Stay on-topic.
Enhance accessibility.
Verify information.
Encourage meaningful discussions.

You can access the AI Wiki at the following link: AI Wiki

Let's create a thriving AI community together!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

ikidd@lemmy.world

Should there be a law mandating all AI generated content be tagged? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 week ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/ai_@lemmy.world

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Original question by @SpiderUnderUrBed@lemmy.zip

Title, or at least the inverse be encouraged. This has been talked about before, but with how bad things are getting, and how realistic goods ai generated videos are getting, anything feels better than nothing, AI generated watermarks, or metadata can be removed, but thats not the point, the point is deterrence. Immediately all big tech will comply (atleast on the surface for consumer-facing products), and then we will probably see a massive decrease in malicious use of it, people will bypass it, remove watermarks, fix metadata, but the situation should be quite a bit better? I dont see many downsides/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Sandbar_Trekker@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What does the watermark really give you?

It gives a false sense that you can tell what's AI and what's not. Especially when anything created malicously is likely going to remove that watermark anyway. Pandoras box is already open on those abilities and there's no putting the lid back.

And, even in the case of non-maliciously generated work, if you suspect that something is AI, but it doesnt have a watermark, do you start investigations into how a video/image/story(text) was created? Doesn't that mean that any artist or author is now going to need to prove their innocence just because someone suspects that their work had some form of AI involved in the process at some point?

It's bad enough that they have to worry about those accusations from average people to begin with, but now you're just giving ammunition for anyone (or any corporation) to drag them through the legal system based on what "appears" to be AI generated.

Edit: typo