this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
338 points (98.3% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

7396 readers
1050 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Identity is aquired naturally. National Identity isn’t.

In other systems our core identity might be city, or village, or lake, or mountain range, or tribe, or class, or job, or beliefs, or culture, or relgion, or clan, or langauge, or dialect etc.

National Identity (Nationalism) is a rather new thing to be mainstream. Only a couple centuries.

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

Maybe this is too idealistic, but I strongly believe that instead of identifying with one arbitrary group or another, perhaps we should aim to identify as human or even as part of the nature itself.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Nationalism as an ideology is relatively new, identity and sentiment tied to a state and shared cultural grouping is very old and it's actually quite debated when you could really say it evolved.

For example:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalism_in_the_Middle_Ages

And if you ever want to fluster a classical studies professor, ask them whether they consider Roman identity to be nationalism in front of a peer.